The Symphony is a rather titanic work, filled with dense modern clashes and collages of many different musical strains, from baroque to free jazz, from marches to the blues, all interspersed within a linear fire-breathing avant orchestral setting. In the original liners reproduced for the CD edition Schnittke called what he was doing "polystylistics" and noted his debt to pioneering composers like Ives and Mahler. No doubt the singular Schittke First was and is a landmark venture into a postmodern landscape, albeit a kind of continuation and extension of collage style. Schnittke was most certainly at this phase of his career one of the most important exponents of the new cacophony, the "impure" form of modernism of the last years of the 20th century. This is a extremely important and also extremely engaging work that gives us a window onto the era as seen by a brilliant musical mind.
I missed the original LP issue at the time. It was not widely distributed in the States but I soon heard of the composer and ultimately began exploring his music in some depth based on what became available to me.
This recording marked a real turning point for the composer. He envisioned it as a kind of chronology of the 20th century in musical terms. There are aleatoric elements and huge expanses of orchestral sound that require a very large symphony orchestra, which subsequently produces some of the most remarkable sonic spectacular fireworks you are likely to hear from such an outfit.
A good deal of preparation no doubt was required to get it all right. The performance has nothing of the slapdash to it, though there are extraordinarily chaotic qualities to parts of the work. Rozhdestvensky manages to convey the excitement and turbulence of the music while parsing out each sound event section with some care and attention to the overarching whole.
There is at least one later recording available according to Amazon. I have not heard any but this one. The historic and artistic importance of the Melodiya recording makes it essential, surely. It is indispensable Schnittke and a breakthrough postmodern work that should be studied and appreciated by anyone committed to understanding late modernity in the orchestral sphere. It is also a breathtaking work in definitive performance!
If you want to know how we got to where we are today, this belongs in your library.
Grego, the newer recording is of the Royal Stockholm Phil under Segerstam. It's on YouTube if you'd like to compare the two, although MP3 sound quality will obviously give you an incomplete impression. As you might expect given who's conducting, chaos is very much to the fore in the Segerstam!ReplyDelete
Anyway, this is surely one of the great 20th-century "anti-symphonies". I find it fascinating that Schnittke began his symphonic output (not counting the Bruckner-esque "no.0", actually not a bad work despite its obvious debt to Schnittke's teacher, Shostakovich) with this work, almost as though he had to put what the symphony had been up until that point to bed before attempting to rebuild it over the course of the seven (or eight, if you count the unfinished 9th) symphonies that followed.
Yes--noticed it on Amazon. Will have to listen! Very bold beginning to his symphonic output, yes, for sure! Thanks for your input as always!