This one brings us to an Enescu we (or rather I) knew little about--the later, evolved composer for orchestra. Both works have much to offer the attentive listener. The "Ouverture de concert sur des themes dans le caractere populaire roumain," op. 32, as the title makes clear, brings us to Romanian folk territory, but of course not in some unmediated way, but rather with all the compositional syntheses and developments one might expect from the composer. It is short, over all-too-soon within ten minutes.
We are compensated by the lengthy and accomplished "Symphony No. 3," op. 21. As the liner notes suggest clearly, Enescu experiments with musical structure by combining sonata form with endless transformations-variations on specific thematic elements. I don't suspect the ordinary listening ear picks up on this technique while experiencing the symphony as it unravels, unless one knows to watch for the developments, score-in-hand. But it is as a building that contains supports. You don't have to know where the supports are to appreciate the building's beauty. I didn't experience it in my listening anyway, except to feel like the music was springing from an endless font of invention. This I am sure was as the composer wished.
It is a work of a ravishing sort, not especially Romanian sounding as much as universally expressive, a heightened, well-woven, late romantic work of great character.
Hannu Lintu (who we encountered yesterday on his Ligeti disk) conducts the Tampere Philharmonic with excellent results for both works. Anyone with an interest in Romanian/Eastern European symphonists should not miss it. But it will sound well no matter what your background, I should think. This is a side of Enescu that should not be missed.
Hi - apparently at the time this was premiered people made comments about the work resembling Dante's Commedia - though then one must point out that Enescu's Purgatorio comes before the Inferno of the second movement. I just listened to this for the first time too, though in a live Gergiev performance I found online. The first movement was not quite clear to me as a structure, but then the inferno and quasi-paradiso that follow overwhelmed me with their power and originality. I was even more taken with this work than with his opera Oedipe; you may like to explore his late vocal-orchestral work, Vox Maris, which to my mind is a great visionary work about the spirit of nature, both frightening and transcendent.
ReplyDeleteThank you Welker for your interesting comments. I do not know his Vox Maris but will certainly be on the lookout for it!
ReplyDeleteCheers,
Grego